首页> 外文OA文献 >Responsiveness of the Oswestry Disability Index and the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire in Italian subjects with sub-acute and chronic low back pain
【2h】

Responsiveness of the Oswestry Disability Index and the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire in Italian subjects with sub-acute and chronic low back pain

机译:Oswestry残疾指数和Roland Morris残疾问卷对意大利亚急性和慢性下腰痛患者的反应能力

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Introduction An ability to assess longitudinal changes in health status is crucial for the outcome measures used in treatment efficacy trials. The aim of this study was to verify the responsiveness of the Italian versions of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) in subjects with subacute or chronic low back pain (LBP). Material and methods At the beginning and end of an 8 week rehabilitation programme, 179 patients completed a booklet containing the ODI, the RMDQ, a 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS), and the 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). A global perception of change scale was also completed at the end of the programme, and collapsed to produce a dichotomous outcome (i.e. improved vs. not improved). Responsiveness was assessed by means of distribution methods [minimum detectable change (MDC); effect size (ES); standardised response mean (SRM)] and anchorbased methods (ROC curves). Results The MDC for the ODI and RMDQ was, respectively, 13.67 and 4.87; the ESwas 0.53 and 0.68; and the SRM was 0.80 and 0.81. ROC analysis revealed an area under the curve of 0.71 for the ODI and 0.64 for the RMDQ, thus indicating discriminating capacity; the best cut-off point for the dichotomous outcome was 9.5 for the ODI (sensitivity 76% and specificity 63%) and 2.5 for the RMDQ (sensitivity 62% and specificity 55%). These estimates were comparable between the subacute and chronic subjects. Both the ODI and the RMDQ moderately correlated with the SF-36 and NRS (Spearman's and Pearson's correlation coefficients of>0.30). Conclusion The Italian ODI and RMDQ proved to be sensitive in detecting clinical changes after conservative treatment for subacute and chronic LBP.Our findings are consistentwith those published in the literature, thus allowing cross-cultural comparisons and stimulating cross-national studies. © 2011 Springer-Verlag.
机译:简介评估健康状况的纵向变化的能力对于治疗功效试验中使用的结局指标至关重要。这项研究的目的是验证意大利版本的Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)和Roland Morris残疾问卷(RMDQ)对亚急性或慢性下腰痛(LBP)受试者的反应性。材料和方法在为期8周的康复计划的开始和结束时,有179名患者完成了一本小册子,其中包含ODI,RMDQ,0-10数字评分量表(NRS)和36项简短健康调查(SF) -36)。在计划结束时也完成了对变化量表的全球理解,并且崩溃了,产生了二分结果(即改进与未改进)。通过分配方法[最小可检测变化(MDC);效应大小(ES);标准化响应平均值(SRM)]和基于锚的方法(ROC曲线)。结果ODI和RMDQ的MDC分别为13.67和4.87; ES分别为0.53和0.68; SRM分别为0.80和0.81。 ROC分析显示,ODI的曲线下面积为0.71,RMDQ的曲线下面积为0.64,从而表明了区分能力。对于二分结果,最佳的分界点是ODI的9.5(敏感性76%,特异性63%)和RMDQ的2.5(敏感性62%,特异性55%)。这些估计在亚急性和慢性受试者之间是可比的。 ODI和RMDQ均与SF-36和NRS适度相关(Spearman和Pearson的相关系数> 0.30)。结论意大利ODI和RMDQ被证明对保守治疗亚急性和慢性LBP后的临床变化敏感,我们的发现与文献中的发现一致,因此可以进行跨文化比较并促进跨国研究。 ©2011年Springer-Verlag。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号